Training Service Dogs

On the April 18, Jamie added a surprise to my routine. He introduced a second dog that would be tested the following day. He said that Tom would be testing three dogs and he would be testing possibly four dogs. He said that the last dog was not ready for testing and he would leave this dog for another day.

We worked all day getting the dogs ready for the test. I was comfortable with the two dogs I was working with and asked where the last dog was and if I could try the dog. Jamie said the dog was not ready and he did not want to test the dog.

Then on Wednesday, the American Kennel Club tester arrived and was very surprised when told he had nine dogs for the test. We had a good chat about which dog would be a replacement for the one eyed dog. Jamie said that he would be able to chose from three dogs and would be there in the afternoon to start working with two of the three dogs. The tester asked if he could accompany us when we went into town. Jamie said yes and we started testing the dogs.

When we were finished, the tester said all the dogs passed and he would receive the certificates yet that afternoon when he printed them. The tester spent some time talking with Tom and then with me. He said he was pleased the way the dogs tested and asked how long each had been training and commented that they had been in training longer than many of the dogs he tested. Jamie said that he prefers longer training for mobility dogs as then they work quicker with the person needing a mobility dog.

The fellow getting the replacement dog arrived shortly after noon, looked at the three dogs, and asked how many he could work with that afternoon. When he was told that we could use all three he said he would have a room for the evening and could extend his stay for a day if needed. With that, we loaded the three dogs and headed for town.

When we arrived at the store, Alfred was there to greet us and when he saw the AKC tester, he thanked him for being there. The individual selected the dog for starting and worked his way around the store and then they went to another store. There the owner met him at the entrance and told him that there was some floor remodeling happening and asked if he could avoid the need to enter the store for today. With that, they went to another store and worked their way to two more stores.

When they arrived back at the first store, the fellow said he felt very comfortable with the dog and asked Jamie if he needed to work with the other two dogs. Jamie said that was the dog he had for him and while the other two were also trained, he could select that dog. The fellow said that this was the dog for him and the tester handed him a copy of the good citizen certificate and another copy to Jamie.

Jamie sent the two of us and the two dogs back home and gave us directions of what to do. He said he would contact me the next day. The tester remained with Jamie and would return with him.

Tom and I talked on our way back and he thanked me for helping with the testing and stepping forward about the trainer that did not have his dogs trained. He said the previous week had been nerve wracking and it was as if that trainer was trying to interrupt their training. He was happy that Alfred had found the relevant information to end the trainer from coming into businesses with untrained dogs.

I said that not all of Jamie's dogs were trained completely the first time they are taken into town, but most are ready for the good citizen test. He agreed and said this is why he likes working for him as most of the training is done at his farm and the customers are often introduced to the dogs before they are taken into town. He then said in the two years, he had met many people that needed mobility service dogs and in that time three people did not want to go into town as they felt the dogs would work in the communities in which they lived. One was a second dog to replace a dog that was retired.

Then he asked me about the AKC tester and I said the judge had him at the trial and he had us retest both dogs for the judge and knew what happened. I said I am happy that nine dogs were tested today and I wish the last dog had been tested, but Jamie had his reason, so I will let it go.

Then he said that there were four other dogs in training and all were for clients. He said that there were more dogs going out each month than the previous year. He added that they had more access to dogs than when I started working for him and more breeds suitable for mobility dogs.

I thanked him and said I was returning home. He thanked me and said he would be finishing the chores for the day.

Service Dog Replacement

This is a continuation of a blog from March 24, 2017 at this link.

On April 5, my friend (Jamie) called and asked if I could assist him in training a replacement dog for the fellow that had his dog loose one eye. My friend said that on April 4, the fellow had told him and the judge that the dog had passed. The veterinary said the whip had gone beyond taking out the eye and had damaged the dog's brain and the dog had passed due to the injury. The veterinary found the evidence when he posted the dog.

Jamie said that under normal circumstances, he could handle an additional dog, but he was already working with six dogs and adding another dog would not help the dogs he was training. I asked if he could use another person and gave him the name (Tom). He said that person was already working with three dogs for him and was unavailable at this time.

I said I would be there on Monday, April 17 but that we would need to go over my schedule of doctor appointments. He agreed and thanked me for helping.

On the April 17, I was at Jamie's and all three of us were present. I was told I would be working with a dog ready for the American Kennel Club good citizen test. We would be working in town today and then on Wednesday, I would take the dog for the test. The AKC tester from the trial would be doing the test and was aware of what happened to the dog from the trial. I would have the dog on Tuesday to work for the test and become better acquainted with the dog.

The dog was a pleasure to work on Monday and I felt that the dog would work with anyone. The store owner (Alfred) that was with us for the trail was happy to see us and said that his employees would be working with us as he had a meeting he could not miss. He did not tell us that we would be facing a pair of noisy dogs and that they could be problems for us. Our dogs behaved, but the other two dogs would not.

It turned out that there was another service dog trainer and it was his dogs that were not properly trained. The employees did ask the trainer to remove his dogs from the store while our dogs were in the store, but he refused and said his dogs had just as much right as our dogs to be in stores. At that point, we pulled our dogs out and went on to several other stores. That trainer tried to follow us, but when we split up, he was not able to follow.

Because all of us knew our way around the town, we were able to go more businesses. When we were back to the first store, the employees wanted to know how they could refuse entry to dogs that misbehaved so poorly. Jamie hesitated, so I said that the behavior was all they needed to have the dogs removed. I asked how many times have our dogs behaved poorly. One employee said only once and that was caused by a store customer creating the problem. I said that most of the dogs brought into businesses are near passing the AKC good citizen test or have passed it. The two dogs we saw today are not ready for the test.

In addition, businesses do not need to accept dogs with behavior that poor. The trainer is doing all service dogs a disservice and this will allow all businesses to reject good service dogs.

My friend was trying to get me to stop and I turned to him and asked how he could accept the behavior of such poorly trained dogs. They are a threat to your dogs being accepted in this town and will not make good service dogs. They are obviously not going to be mobility service dogs because of their small size and their poor behavior will cause other business owners to reject your larger mobility dogs and rightfully so.

Tom spoke then and said he agreed with me and said he needed to do something about the other trainer. As he spoke, the trainer and his two dogs entered the business. Both dogs started barking and raising a fuss at our dogs. I had my dog lie down and stepped in the path of the trainer and his two dogs. The trainer asked me to move aside and I said when his dogs behaved as if they had been trained and not before. Jamie stepped forward and his dog dropped in place.

Jamie spoke and said that all three of us agree that your dogs do not belong in businesses. They are too poorly trained and showed it. They bark incessantly and try to go in any direction. Businesses do have the right to refuse entry to any dog that has not passed the American Kennel Club good citizen test. You will notice that our dogs do not bark, when I walked away from the dog I am working with, it dropped in place as did my assistant's dog. I will not allow other dogs to ruin the position they have earned over the years I have used businesses in this town.

The other trainer said, but service dogs are to be allowed in any business under the American Disabilities Act. Wrong, Jamie answered. They can reject dogs that do not pass the AKC good citizen test. I can say and I know my assistants will agree that your dogs will not pass the test. When my dogs go into a restaurant, many people don't even know they are there unless they see them come in. My dogs don't bark unless the wheel chair their owner is in tips over and their owner cannot move. Plus the barking is not continuous like your dogs.

At that point, the store owner, Alfred, entered and asked what the problem was. The two dogs started barking loudly and would not quit. Alfred asked the trainer to remove his dogs and he refused. At that point, he had an employee call the police and ask an officer to be there quickly.

While we were waiting, the two dogs continued barking and misbehaving. When the officer arrived, he had a copy of the American Disabilities Act and read the section about businesses being allowed to prevent misbehaving dogs from being allowed in businesses. Then he asked the trainer of the two dogs to remove his dogs and keep them out of businesses in this town until they were trained and could pass the test of the American Kennel Club. The trainer complained that he was being forced out and his dogs were being discriminated against. At that point, another officer entered the business and together they removed the dogs and the trainer. What was said outside we don't know, but Alfred said he was the one that had gotten the American Disabilities Act for the police department and marked the section about misbehaving dogs for the police.

Jamie asked if he had made copy that he could read. One of his employees handed him a copy and he read this to himself and then asked if he could keep the copy. Yes, the copy was for him and he could have a copy for each of his assistants. He took two more copies and thanked Alfred. Alfred said because his dogs were well trained, there would always be a place for them in his business and most other businesses.

I Am Restarting This Blog

Because of some recent events, I am now working more frequently with a dog trainer and feel that I need to blog about some of the new activities.  On April 18, 2017 I will have the next blog.

This Blog Is Closing

I am stopping this blog. I have enjoyed some of the topics and comments to them. I have really appreciated the emails and wish to thank those people. I will continue working with the mobility dog trainer as I am able.

It is a shame for all the service dog fraud that is happening, but I can only advise people to write their congressional members and express their displeasure. I have done this for the last year, but it has not yielded any response. I cannot deal with the negative stories and constant fraud articles. I see enough of that happening in my own small town from people with their “comfort” dogs. I have never seen so many ill tempered pets and know of a few that have been bitten by these “comfort” dogs. One grocery store has evicted several of these “comfort” dogs and they return with “fake” documents all the time.

Service dogs in the public places are supposed to be trained to be silent generally and not cause a nuisance to people round them.

I will keep my blog here up and operating as long as I am able.  I may publish a few service dog blogs there.

Good-bye

Too Much Service Dog Fraud

In many of the articles, I have been reading lately about service dogs, I see too much service dog fraud being foisted on the American public. This summer, I had a couple of days that I spent with the trainer of mobility service dogs. He was working on the good citizen's phase with two dogs so that they would be ready for placement with people needing mobility service dogs.

What does this mean? It means training the dog to behave in public, not to bark or misbehave when in the public or in stores. Yes, they are taught when to bark if their owner goes down or becomes unable to get up if the wheel chair is tipped over.

Because this is still training, my friend has always had a good relation with the police and other law enforcement agencies and always alerts them when he will be in town doing training. The first day, the storeowner was happy to see him and asked what the second dog was doing. He introduced me and stated I was his assistant and had worked with him for two years on and off. In looking around the store, I noticed that there were two levels and two steps up to the second level.

When I mentioned this to the storeowner, he asked me to come with him. From a storage closet, he removed a ramp and showed me the two hooks on one end and said to watch while he put the ramp in place. My friend said he knew of this and told the storeowner that the next day he would be back with two possible matches for the dogs and one of them would be in a wheel chair. The storeowner said they would follow normal procedures as they had in the past and use the wider and slightly longer ramp. My friend said you have a longer ramp? The storeowner then put the one ramp back and removed the second ramp and put it in place. He then explained that because of its length, it would need to be raised and lowered because it would block the nearest isle and he did not want people to fall over it. He said that all of his clerks knew how to use it and one would be around to assist during the visit.

While we had been watching, three teenage boys had been moving closer to us. The storeowner asked them what he could do for them. One of them said for us to move away from the dogs as they should not be in the store and they were going to remove them. The storeowner said that the dogs were in training and were allowed in the store. The loudest boy said he was tired to seeing dogs allowed in shops, restaurants, and other places around town and he was going to put a stop to this.

The storeowner quietly said for them to put the guns away. He had seen one of the city police enter the store and that he had moved up behind the three boys. He then spoke up and told the boys to put their weapons on the floor and back up toward his voice. Two of them did, but the loudest boy was not going to and started to turn with the weapon in his hand. My friend said one word, drop, and the storeowner, my friend, and I dropped to the floor. The two dogs dropped at the same time, but I could tell they were ready for action if called on.

The boy turned to see what had happened and the policeman collared him and took the weapon away in one quick move. Then the policeman asked for back up to escort the boys to jail. He used his handcuffs for the loudest one and when two other city police arrived, the other two were handcuffed and taken out of the store. The storeowner said the loudest was the ringleader and would probably spend some time locked up.

I asked if there was hope for the other two and the storeowner said he hoped so and would be considering this in court. I asked if it would be possible for the two to be on hand to watch the dogs in action the next day as we moved around town and in and out of different businesses. My friend said it may be worth the effort to walk over to city hall and the police office and talk to them. The storeowner wished us luck and we left.

The police chief was not impressed with our proposal, but did talk to a couple of the police for their opinion. Both stated this may be good for the two boys, but not the third as he and his dad were troublemakers in the town. The two boys had already stated that the son of the gun storeowner had supplied the weapons they had.

The chief asked what time we would be there and then told the two policemen to make sure they had time to spare as they were assigned to be with the boys. The next day we were ready for trouble and had warned the police of this before we even started. The Chief put two others on what we had suggested and they did catch the loud boy's father before he could do the damage we had suspected. He had positioned himself along the route we would be traveling and was standing with a weapon ready to kill one or both dogs.

When we completed the day, both boys were impressed and asking questions. They knew one of the clients for one of the dogs and were surprised how well they worked together and most of the questions were directed to her. They asked if she would be coming back to school and she disappointed them by saying that the dog may be strong, but not for three flights of stairs at their school. She would be required to attend a school with no flights of stairs. Then she dropped the bomb on them when she said she would be ready to testify against and gave the loud boy's name. One finally got his voice back and asked if he was the one that caused her to need a wheel chair. Yes, was her answer and I said that maybe his father was looking for her as well.

With that, the two boys were back in custody and we were on our way back to my friend's farm. My friend recounted the events of the previous day and why the two boys were there today. The girl said she felt very comfortable with her dog and the other person said he was not and that maybe he should wait for a larger dog. My friend agreed and thought both had made good choices.

As much as I have enjoyed this blog, there will be no more posts because of all the fraud happening in the service dog world. When and if the people responsible act to put penalties and some other actions into place to prevent this, I find no joy in promoting the service dog world. I am tired to seeing “comfort dogs” in grocery stores and other places just because people feel that fake documents allow them to take poor behaving pets in stores where pets are normally not allowed. There are just too many places on the internet making all sorts of fake documents available.

Thank you for reading, and good-bye.

Wikipedia Definition of Service Dog

Occasionally there is a need to look at the Wikipedia pages, but when something is so grossly in error, I have to wonder why I looked. Why you ask? When a breed of dogs that the homeowner's insurance in most states will not cover, you need to be concerned. In the second paragraph, there is a list of dogs often trained for use by service dog organizations. This statement, “And in recent years American Pit Bull Terriers are the most common breeds used as service dogs”, should be considered an error as by their very nature, few have the temperament to serve as service dogs and I would not even consider working around the pit bull breed.


I have talked to several insurance agents locally and asked about whether the insurance companies they represented would cover pit bull terrier dogs on homeowner insurance or even renter insurance. Every one declared that no; the pit bull terriers would not be covered. I also know from my own experiences with several individuals that do own them that the temperament is not reliable. One family swore they trusted their pit bull, but about three years ago, the dog took quite a bite out of their son's face. At the time, the police seized the dog and put him down. The courts have now decided that the police did the right thing.


The list of dogs many insurance companies will not cover is growing and even a couple of breeds/mixed breeds used for mobility service dogs are now on the list of at least one insurance company. It is mainly because of their size and the damage they can do in some stores that has earned them the notoriety.


Therefore, I can only urge people contemplating a service dog to check with their insurance company to find out if the breed/mixed breed they are considering is covered.


Dogs should have desirable character traits, especially good temperament or psychological make-up and good health. Dogs should be matched to the task for which they are trained. Therefore, a Dachshund or a Beagle would not be selected as a mobility service dog, but a Newfoundland or a Saint Bernard would make an excellent mobility service dog. This is a good site to search for a breed and then look up each breed individually to discover the health problems with that breed.


Most dog breeds or mix of breeds are capable of being some type of service dog, but most are eliminated because they do not have the health qualifications or temperament qualities needed.

Diabetes Service Dogs Work

Dr. Bill Quick seems to have passed on this study. Maybe this is because the study was done in the UK and is reporting positive results. I had to put in this dig, but Dr. Quick is a scientific minded person and has no time for things research has not proven. Whether this is a strength or a weakness depends on your beliefs as well.


Having observed diabetes service dogs in action and having one alert on me while visiting a person with a diabetes alert dog, leaves no doubt in my mind that a properly trained diabetes service dog is capable of being another tool for those that need this assistance. I have read about diabetes service dogs that were not properly trained and a State of Missouri lawsuit against a seller that was not selling properly training dogs.


The study was published in PLOS ONE. Unfortunately, the issue date is not given, but some research located it. The full abstract and study may be read here. As stated, this study is the first of its kind. It analyzes whether trained dogs can accurately and consistently serve as an early-warning system.


Seventeen dogs trained by Medical Detection Dogs, a UK charity that works with researchers and universities and trains dogs for several medical diseases. In this study, the researchers collected data from the owners to analyze whether the dogs were accurately able to respond to their hypoglycemic levels. They also checked whether the owners experienced better blood glucose management.


The results show that all 17 owners reported positive outcomes, including: Fewer paramedic calls, fewer unconscious episodes, and improved independence. “Lead author Dr. Nicola Rooney says: "Despite considerable resources having been invested in developing electronic systems to facilitate tightened glycemic control, current equipment has numerous limitations."


"These findings are important as they show the value of trained dogs and demonstrate that 'glycemia alert dogs' placed with clients living with diabetes, afford significant improvements to owner well-being, including increased glycemic control, client independence and quality-of-life, and potentially could reduce the costs of long-term health care."


The important point of the study is that it confirms that trained detection dogs perform better than the chance level, meaning the level that would be expected if random choices were made. The amusing fact it that as of yet, no one can figure how the dogs are able top detect the change since an odor, sweat, or breath has been detected, except by the dogs.


Dr. Nicola Rooney does state that further research is needed. Of course, they want to see if they can determine how the dogs are able to this. Most previous studies focused on hypoglycemia only, but this study also considered hyperglycemia. Some dogs had started to alert at times of high blood glucose. This was important to the researchers because this meant that there was less time between highs and lows. Therefore, the researchers check the medical records from before and after dog allocation.


The types of dogs in the study included six Labrador Retrievers (LR), one Golden Retriever (GR), two LR/GR cross, one Poodle, one Collie Cross, two Labradoodles, one Lurcher, one Cocker Spaniel and one Yorkshire Terrier.

Can Therapy Dogs Help Kids With Autism?

ASDA (Autism Service Dogs of America) was founded in 2002 by Priscilla Taylor. Incorporating her love of dogs and her background as a special education teacher, she formed this non-profit, community-based organization to aid special children. While many service dog agencies existed to meet diverse needs, none provided specially trained dogs for children with autism. Ms. Taylor, Founder and Director of ASDA, received some of her education at Assistance Dog Institute, the only institution of higher education for dog studies in the world. The ASDA was not part of this study, but I felt it should be included to give more meaning.

While ASDA may be a great organization, their advocacy of having autism service dogs for parents to enjoy an evening out while leaving the child at home tethered to a service dog seems like cruel and unusual punishment and an abandonment of their responsibility as parents. I can only hope that they hired a baby sitter as well. If not then I feel there is something wrong happening here.

Service dogs for autism provide a physical and emotional anchor for children with autism. When out in the community, a service dog can increase safety and make families feel secure. In many cases, the service dog accompanies the child to school, where its calming presence can minimize and often eliminate emotional outbursts, enabling the child to participate in his or her school day. Transitioning among school day activities is eased and the service dog provides a focus through which the child can interact with other children. This helps increase the opportunity for the child to develop social and language skills.

Even though the above is promoted and stated by ASDA, I know what has happened around the country with other service dogs. I am wondering if an adult is not required for supervision of the dog in the classroom and at the school. Many school districts have prevented service dogs in the school until the age of 14 to 16 unless accompanied by an adult.

I will give ASDA credit for stating that not every child with autism will benefit from a service dog. The do say that they screen and evaluate each situation to have a goal that ensures a successful match of the child, the family, and the dog. Because of the successes that have been achieved, demand for specialized service dogs for autism is growing rapidly. Under the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA), there are no exceptions to where a service dog is allowed; all public places must allow access. It is important however that the child’s school be cooperative. ASDA will not place dogs with children whose school will not allow a service dog. As least they did acknowledge this.

I can be appreciative of the fact that the ASDA wants dogs that have reached adulthood and be fully trained first. It is also important to remember that while the dog will probably become a trusted member or your family, its purpose is as a service animal, not a pet. I do like that they have a socialization and training program from eight weeks of age, and then graduate to the advanced training at approximately 18 weeks of age.

From my experience of being with a trainer of mobility dogs, I know how important the advanced training is and most of the steps involved. The dogs accompany the trainer to various locations, schools, classrooms, and public places. During this time the dogs are being trained in public access skills, socialization skills, and other skills they will need as a service dog for the special challenges of autism. Upon passing the public access test, the dogs will be matched with a child and family from the waiting list.